Not sure if he did it, but OOOPS! She dit it Again!

Playboy won't pay for Britney

If her embarrassing performance at the VMAs was any sort of indication of Britney Spears' current net worth, then I think we can all say that a star has fallen. Should you need any tangible evidence of her decline, consider her latest PR disaster.

The National Ledger reports that Playboy will only shell out no more than $400 grand to have Britney pose nude and show all her sweet juicy stuff nude for a Playboy centerfold spread.

Britney insists that she won't take her clothes off for less than seven figures, a sum that has been scoffed at by editor/founder Hugh Hefner.

Damn! And I was hoping to see her stink ass there!

Seriously, we've seen all there is to see of Britney Spears for free. The only thing Playboy could add to that is some air-brushing and good lighting, which would be a small improvement, but not enough to make up for the fact that no one out there wants to see that woman naked. If I'm wrong about this, please let me know. OK, you're right we can stand a little more, just please don't flood my e-mail box with too many requests for this!

You know that saying about how you can't put the toothpaste back into the tube? Well, I think that pretty much sums up Britney Spears.